Re: [Xen-devel] credit scheduler and HYPERVISOR_yield()

[John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:06:14AM +0200, Emmanuel Ackaouy wrote:

> The expected behavior of yield() (or any schedule operation really) is
> that the current VCPU will be placed on the runq behind all VCPUs of
> equal or greater priority.
> 
> Looking at __runq_insert() in sched_credit.c, it looks correct to me in
> that respect.
> 
> Can you clarify what's going wrong?

It looks fine... no idea how I misread the code.

sorry,
john

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel