Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix evtchn rebind

To:	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix evtchn rebind
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:57:43 +0100
Delivery-date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:53:40 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<D470B4E54465E3469E2ABBC5AFAC390F013B221D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acfzectbjv+DxmczSCOsZF4OrI2lMwABnjps
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix evtchn rebind
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

Actually I thought this was guaranteed already in the normal set_affinity()
case. Are you saying that fixup_irqs() will change bindings without masking
first?

 -- Keir

On 10/9/07 08:11, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> rebind_irq_to_cpu needs to mask evtchn before bind, which should
> be same as what evtchn_rebind_cpu does today. Or else cpu_disable
> fails at fixup_irqs.
> 
> Signed-off-by Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix evtchn rebind