| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: free_irq_vector on ia64
|
To: |
"Duan, Ronghui" <ronghui.duan@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: free_irq_vector on ia64 |
|
From: |
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:08:29 -0600 |
|
Cc: |
Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Xing Z" <xing.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:15:55 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<82C666AA63DC75449C51EAD62E8B2BEC18391D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Organization: |
OSLO R&D |
|
References: |
<82C666AA63DC75449C51EAD62E8B2BEC18391D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 15:27 +0800, Duan, Ronghui wrote:
> Hi Alex:
>
> I follow your steps to hide e1000 from domain0, adding
> "pciback.hide==
> (0000:01:00.0)" in append line, then reboot .It seem that all right. The
> NAT consumption fault may have fixed by this patch:
> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/7158623a1b3d
>
> Could you please have a check?
That could be why I don't get a NaT consumption like the comment
indicated, but I still get the Oops. It doesn't seem like there's
anything platform specific here, so I'm not sure why you don't see it.
Note that I'm hiding function 1 of a two port, two function e1000, while
you're hiding function 0. I don't know if that matters, but perhaps a
variable to play with.
> BTW: It seems that we don't free irq_handler of e1000, so when
> rebooting, there may be some warning message printing in the serial
> port!
> Thank you!
Yup, that's a bug in our base 2.6.18 kernel which should go away next
time we re-base. However, that's a separate issue. Thanks,
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home