On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:20:06PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 29/8/07 01:43, "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:05:05AM -0700, Keir Fraser wrote:
> >> Isn't that a kexec bug? Multiboot command lines include the image name in
> >> all other cases. If there's no suitable name, perhaps a dummy name should
> >> be
> >> included?
> >
> > I was wondering where it should be fixed. Do you know if
> > supplying BOOT_IMAGE is part of the multiboot specification?
>
> Ah, sorry, I forgot that you repro'ed this on IA64 which does not use
> multiboot at all.
>
> The problem here is, I believe, that the cooking of the command line to
> strip the image name is actually an arch-specific operation. I notice that
> e.g., Linux on IA64 does nto bother to do this at all. The fact that the
> name is prefixed with BOOT_IMAGE= absolutely avoids any possible name clash
> with cmdline parameters. Look at /proc/cmdline on a native IA64 Linux box
> for example -- the image name is not stripped off.
>
> What I will do is make arch/x86/setup.c strip the image name before calling
> the generic parser. That should make IA64 much happier. Hopefully it will be
> okay for PPC too.
Great, I think that solution will work quite well.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home