|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature
On 10/8/07 18:00, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(XEN) map_pages_to_xen : 3533 (that's the line number)
(XEN) 0xfff9b000 was NOT present.
Something between (*) and here seems to trash this presence flag.
paging_init() and many others lie in between the upper call and this one here. Could be a side effect of this? Maybe that tlb flush at the right place in one of these functions would solve the problem?
Yes, this now looks likely and that’s rather scary. We’ll go after this next week.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Stefan Berger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Stefan Berger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Stefan Berger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Stefan Berger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Stefan Berger
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [Xen] Check FADT's signature, Stefan Berger
|
|
|
|
|