| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vmx: last branch recording MSR emulation
>>> "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> 09.08.07 14:25 >>>
>We don't want to use this feature currently because _each_
>vmentry/vmexit will have to do additional msr operations.
Then why would hardware supply the feature?
Also, as long as the guest doesn't use the feature, no extra saves/restores
are being needed.
Further, since there's no feature detection mechanism (other than family:model)
for a guest to determine whether to make use of that functionality, a guest
trying to do so would likely mis-behave (most likely crash on the attempt to
write a non-zero value to DebugCtlMSR). Certainly, there are more thing like
this that can happen, but for this specific part I'm about to submit a Linux
patch to make use of the functionality - such kernels would then no longer
work under HVM.
Finally, with LBR registers being used in Xen itself (optionally), you'd expose
hypervisor internal information to HVM's, which is generally considered a
security risk.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home