 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] XENPF_ numbering?
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] XENPF_ numbering? |
| From: | John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:17:34 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:15:11 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
I'm sure it's something obvious, but why are there big gaps in XENPF_* numbering? thanks john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Do some checks and settings of CR0 according to VMX capability MSRs, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] XENPF_ numbering?, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Do some checks and settings of CR0 according to VMX capability MSRs, Liu, Eric E |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] XENPF_ numbering?, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
