| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen unstable tree hasn't new changes for weeks
Yes. Unfortunately task switches are bloody complicated, and I have had other stuff to do at the same time. :-( I’m about halfway there. We may do a manual push to the main tree anyway (since the regression tests have only been failing since we raised the acceptance criteria).
-- Keir
On 27/7/07 08:15, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
do you mean you are implementing the handling of task switch vmexit?
-Xin
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:08 PM
To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen unstable tree hasn't new changes for weeks
Nope, it’s just that the automated regression tests are failing because we implemented virtual NMIs for x86 HVM guests but do not yet support virtual hardware task switches. When that code goes in the tests should pass.
-- Keir
On 27/7/07 02:35, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On xen unstable tree, the last check-in is about 2 weeks ago.
While at the same time there are lots of new patches being checked into xen staging tree.
Is xen unstable tree being abandoned?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home