Re: [Xen-devel] Many same managed domain

[Masaki Kanno <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>At 06:09 22/07/2007, Masaki Kanno wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>When I tested xm new command without uuid parameter repeatedly,
>>I saw many same managed domain as follows.
>>
>># xm list
>>Name                                        ID   Mem 
>>VCPUs      State   Time(s)
>>Domain-0                                     0   941     2     r-----     
>>51.9
>># xm new /xen/vm1.conf
>>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf".
>># xm new /xen/vm1.conf
>>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf".
>># xm new /xen/vm1.conf
>>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf".
>># xm list
>>Name                                        ID   Mem 
>>VCPUs      State   Time(s)
>>Domain-0                                     0   941     2     r-----     
>>56.3
>>vm1                                              256     1                
>> 0.0
>>vm1                                              256     1                
>> 0.0
>>vm1                                              256     1                
>> 0.0
>>
>>
>>But, when I tested xm new command with uuid parameter repeatedly,
>>I did not see same managed domain as follows.
>>
>># xm list
>>Name                                        ID   Mem 
>>VCPUs      State   Time(s)
>>Domain-0                                     0   941     2     r-----     
>>69.9
>># xm new /xen/vm1.conf uuid="aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee"
>>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf".
>># xm new /xen/vm1.conf uuid="aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee"
>>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf".
>># xm new /xen/vm1.conf uuid="aaaaaaaa-bbbb-cccc-dddd-eeeeeeeeeeee"
>>Using config file "/xen/vm1.conf".
>># xm list
>>Name                                        ID   Mem 
>>VCPUs      State   Time(s)
>>Domain-0                                     0   941     2     r-----     
>>74.4
>>vm1                                              256     1                
>> 0.0
>>
>>
>>I think that xm new command should cause a command error if without
>>uuid parameter.  What do you think?
>
>
>Either that, or check that the name isn't a duplicate - I added such 
>a check for "xm create" and "xm restore" about two months ago, 
>because it would allow multiple instances of the same domain (with 
>the same UUID - something I never got to the bottom of).

Thanks for your opinion. 
Your patch is changeset 15168, isn't it? 

Best regards,
 Kan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel