RE: [Xen-devel] Anyone succeeds HVM on latest x86-64 xen

["Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm using a 64-bit Linux HVM guest on the latest 64-bit Xen.

-- Dexuan

-----Original Message-----
From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 2007年7月19日 16:21
To: Cui, Dexuan; Tian, Kevin; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Anyone succeeds HVM on latest x86-64 xen

I definitely am able to boot a 32-bit HVM guest on 64-bit Xen with current
unstable.

 -- Keir

On 19/7/07 07:45, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It seems some c/s between 15516 and 15604 breaks x86_64 Xen.
> IA32pae Xen c/s 15605 is OK.
> 
> -- Dexuan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tian, Kevin
> Sent: 2007年7月19日 14:32
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Anyone succeeds HVM on latest x86-64 xen
> 
> I tried latest xen and linux-xen staging tree, but failed to run HVM
> domain on x86-64 environment. domU creation is OK.
> 
> However the weird thing is not HVM domain itself. Instead system
> crashed on dom0 context. I saw once with some stack dump that
> xen's page fault handler is executed on a dom0's stack which then
> causes nested page fault due to unable to fetch vcpu pointer. But
> I'm curious why stack switch doesn't happen?
> 
> Does anybody else observe same failure? I'm still debugging it and
> send out early in case it's my environment issue.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel