WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] irqbalance?

To: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] irqbalance?
From: pak333@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:13:12 +0000
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:11:00 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
resending as i did not receive a response. Anyone out there familiar with irq code
 
thanks
Prabha

 
Hi All,
 
If I turn off irqbalance xen/arch/x86/irq.c, does that actually stop XEN from balancing irqs across different physical cpus, or will that override the setting if there are too many interrupts and one of the cpus is overloaded.
 
Example: i have 4 cpus and i have configured irqbalance= off, so there is no irqbalancing done by xen.
 
Now if i have affintized all my physical interrupts to one cpu say cpu1 all the interrutps should be handled by the cpu1 and so should all the softirqs generated.
Now what happens if one of the other cpus is lightly loaded, will some of the softirqs be queued against the other cpus or will cpu1 handle all interrupts and softirqs.
 
Looks to me like there are two levels of interrupt redirection, one done by the hardware where each physical device interrupt is assigned to a particual processor dynamically and then on top of that is the irqbalancing done by Xen itself. Is that true? and irqbalance=off only affects the latter and interrupt affinitzation is for the former?
 
 
Thanks
Prabha
--- Begin Message ---
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] irqbalance?
From: pak333@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:17:44 +0000
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>