 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK |
| From: | "Shaun R." <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:14:56 -0700 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:13:10 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I've read in a few other posts on this ML that this option cripples linux
performance when compiled into the kernel. I'm wondering though, in the
messages i read it talked about it crippling performance when built into
dom0, what about the domU's. I've been seeing problems with Guests network
locking up with eth0 error stating full queue. On dom0 i have
CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK set as a module and it's not loaded, but on DomU's
it's included into the kernel.
~Shaun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Hvm Guest Image, Xen Xen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] early_cpu_init() and identify_cpu(), Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Hvm Guest Image, Xen Xen |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Question regarding blkif structure, Daniel Stephen Lee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
