 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] consider vcpu-pin weight on CreditScheduler
| To: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] consider vcpu-pin weight on CreditScheduler TAKE2 |
| From: | Emmanuel Ackaouy <ackaouy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:52:32 +0200 |
| Cc: | Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:50:29 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=BPBe9pkECEdorwc8igPXkumdgTJDkfhNLefUxFBTSJj/GoddnFLZcgkgyj6VoYhrMejfHsjTgD/pyqnaQnBA7sgmyvgiIaWWfLMseKm78XJv2IJpa+YQlg1dg4qZ/71Ve7kaETsK8lOlZlERen2VdHpIBxwwyyI30Ck6WeieP84= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=lJ7HFkIm0WoOsNWD32WyGsma+yN9S7pzs657+XCJFDDiRDy9JoAcUzM1qyiTo7R6YyjujEaQ3nFKt7xzopeJXlAE/8/v/2UYpwyVSIB1Ej2ZKqUdq1YrtvF35euYaqItiZQMWqTBzXnsS9GdY8KExmh+2XW3pWGMd46eMEnlacs= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C2A81716.1166C%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <C2A81716.1166C%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Jun 27, 2007, at 14:31, Keir Fraser wrote: Partitioning is a very sensible simplification in many (most?) cases, but would need plumbing all the way up through xen-api, which is a pain. I still suspect that the patch could be simplified even without interface changes. Idon't understand the need to add extra complexity on every accounting period. If you don't want to change the API, the partitioning could just automagically happen when all distinct cpu affinity masks set using the existing interface are non-overlapping. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] consider vcpu-pin weight on CreditScheduler TAKE2, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Shadow Table, Koripella Srinivas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] consider vcpu-pin weight on CreditScheduler TAKE2, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] consider vcpu-pin weight onCreditScheduler TAKE2, Atsushi SAKAI |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
