Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Add hcall to probe Xen heap

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The patches are only to provide information via the toolstack, so there
should be no difference in behaviour with or without them. You should be
able to run numa=on with unstable tip just fine.

 -- Keir

On 17/6/07 17:44, "Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ryan,
> I applied these patches against 15200 and was able to boot on a 4-cell
> ES7000 with numa=on.
> Boots fine. I brought up a few VMs with some loads on them. That seems
> to work fine as well.
> Were there any other data points that you would like me to check out?
> 
> I was able to see the node info from xm info
> node_to_cpu            : node0:24-31
>                          node1:16-23
>                          node2:8-15
>                          node3:0-7
> 
> If you could give me an updated set of patches against the tip, we can
> run our weekly tests with numa=on.
> 
> Thanks
> Raj
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel