RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one perfo

To:	"Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one performanceissue
From:	"Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 12:45:34 +0100
Delivery-date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 04:44:34 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77AA3EE6B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AceY9Hl0TwLbUaskRQO2yUxECeuicQATWl7g
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one performanceissue

> 2. Performance of HVM guest downgraded much.
> Compares with cset 15017, kernel build on HVM against 15072 downgraded
> about 35%.
> And even the execution time of our nightly testing has been doubled.

Please can you try and pin down the range of changesets for this
regression -- there's several possibilities in this range of 55.

Thanks,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against cset 15072 - one performanceis