|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] NMI deferral on i386
 
Looking at cloning this logic to more properly support MCE, I see two issues
with this code:
- by using iret, the NMI is being acknowledged to the CPU, and since nothing
  was done to address its reason, I can't see why it shouldn't re-trigger right
  after that iret (unless it was sent as an IPI)
- by re-issuing it on vector 31, the resulting interrupt will have lower 
priority
  than any external interrupt, hence all pending interrupts will be serviced
  before getting to actually handle the NMI; ideally this should use the highest
  possible vector, but since priorities are grouped anyway, at least allocating
  the vector from the high priority pool would seem necessary
Thanks, Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] NMI deferral on i386,
Jan Beulich <=
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |