|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups
 
On 11/05/07 09:06 +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
 
Hi, Mike
I have one question about this issue.
Is there any performance improvement results are available?
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
 
 
Sakai,
I will perform some micro benchmarks with the patch and without, and
 with grouped domains and no groups. 
I expect there will be no performance benefit and no detriment.
Mike
--
Mike D. Day
IBM LTC
Cell: 919 412-3900
Sametime: ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx AIM: ncmikeday  Yahoo: ultra.runner
PGP key: http://www.ncultra.org/ncmike/pubkey.asc
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups,
Mike D. Day <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
 - [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
 - [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
 - RE: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Ian Pratt
 - [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
 - [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
 - [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |