RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?

To:	"Ryan Harper" <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?
From:	"Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 3 May 2007 22:39:38 -0400
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 03 May 2007 19:38:26 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20070503231005.GP27552@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AceN2DX87Z4eFNDATFSzRimyODXDcgAHPUmw
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?

>what repo and what changeset?  We fixed this issue a while ago, 
>
>I just booted:
>
>changeset:   15020:6f37c763bc0f from 
>http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.1-testing.hg
>
>and
>
>changeset:   15009:3a5722420de7 from 
>http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg
>
>with no issues on my numa hardware.
15007 from unstable.
I will try 15009 unstable and 15020 testing.
Raj

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] network virtualization performances, Herbert Xu
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Ryan Harper
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Numa=on broken?