|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] DomU-Dom0 communication question
 
On 5/2/07, mk.xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mk.xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
  I need to create a custom communication channel between DomU and Dom0 in order to send arbitrary messages/buffers between applications in Dom0 and DomU.
  That sounds strangely familiar to what I had to do last month.  Basically building a mechanism to transport arbitrary strings out of the guest and into Dom0.
 
 
Basically, I am thinking about making a char control driver on both sides that would transport those messages to subscribers on either end using defined IOCL calls.  Seems very doable. 
 
 
I am looking at backend/frontend drivers and I don't think it would work for what I want to do as fron/back ends don't have any devices associated with it.
   Hmm, it sounds like you may be a bit confused regarding how the split drivers work.  For any useful frontend/backend device each side ends up being two drivers in one.  One is the frontend/backend driver, the other is the device that the OS sees.  For example, the networking frontend has all of the code the being a Xen frontend driver (event channels, probe handling, etc) and is also a network device that the guest interacts with.  In a sense it registers itself as two drivers.
  You could definitely write a split driver that has character devices on both ends that share data.  My backend driver for the project I mentioned above is exactly that.  (Frontend kernel puts data onto a ring buffer, backend kernel reads it off and makes it available as a character device.)
 
 Would it be better to utilize event channel directly or write frontend/backend drivers and control drivers on both ends? Or maybe there is another mechanism that already exists in xen environment and I am just trying to do things the hard way? Any advise is greatly appreciated.
  This probably sounds bad, but if you can get away with it I would do everything is user space and send your arbitrary data/buffers over the network link.  Trust me when I say that you'll lose less hair that way.
 
  If you decide to go the split driver route, I can supply you with my code.  It isn't pretty, but it may help you out.  Let me know if you're interested.
  Thanks Ryan 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |