WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] xen-scheduler: runq_insert?

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] xen-scheduler: runq_insert?
From: "Apparao, Padmashree K" <padmashree.k.apparao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:33:42 -0700
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:32:20 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AceI+pUfpPinTCj1QS+DOC4SbnrQTg==
Thread-topic: xen-scheduler: runq_insert?

Hello,

 

Can the runq_insert function in the xen-scheduler be called by two processors at the same time? I would like to modify some functionality for testing and want to know if I need to protect the variables I declare. I do not see a spinlock in when calling this function.

 

Another question. What is the domain_id  is7fff. I print the domain id in runq_insert and I see that sometimes the domain id is 7fff

 

Thanks

= Padma

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>