|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.5 Second Release Candidate
To: |
"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jan Peter Stotz" <Jan-Peter.Stotz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.5 Second Release Candidate |
From: |
"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:11:41 -0700 |
Cc: |
xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx, "Scarlata, Vincent R" <vincent.r.scarlata@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:10:33 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<AEC554657A662A4880670EA30CB9488D01B09439@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<462C7FDE.9060700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><C25240EB.DB5D%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC554657A662A4880670EA30CB9488D01B09439@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AceFjWXopFi/tPGAEduuDQAX8io7RQAKDZfgAAkvIrA= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.5 Second Release Candidate |
I've updated and re-assigned the bug back to Jan, but for those who are
interested and don't monitor Bugzilla:
I wasn't able to reproduce this with the -unstable tip. As a BKM for
working with the vTPM system, one should always delete the
/var/vtpm/VTPM and /var/tpm/tpm_emulator-* files before starting any new
tests or debugging a failure. If using the hardware TPM, then you might
also want to clear it so that the vtpm_manager can take ownership (it
works without this, but it guarantees that the SRK auth matches what the
manager expects).
That said, I did find a bug with failure to initialize a variable, and
I'll bundle that fix in with the 1.1b fix (shortly).
Joe
Cihula, Joseph <> scribbled on Monday, April 23, 2007 9:36 AM:
> Keir Fraser <> scribbled on Monday, April 23, 2007 2:55 AM:
>> This is a bug for either Vinnie Scarlata or Stefan Berger to look
>> into, I think. That code hasn't been touched in quite a while, so I'm
>> not even sure it's being actively maintained any more (in which case
>> we'll remove it).
>
> I've taken over vTPM maintainership from Vinnie and will have a look
> at this today. Please cc me on any future vTPM bugs or questions.
>
> Joe
> P.S. It would be nice if the Bugzilla had a sub-component field that
> could be used for finer-grained reporting (and also email
> notification) of bugs.
>
>>
>> Thanks for the bug report!
>> -- Keir
>>
>> On 23/4/07 10:43, "Jan Peter Stotz"
>> <Jan-Peter.Stotz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Keir Fraser schrieb:
>>>> Well, that didn't take long! This candidate fixes a regression
>>>> which causes 32-bit x86 builds not to work out of the box (Xen is
>>>> built for PAE, but the Linux kernels are not). Also includes Tim
>>>> Deegan's fix for SDL HVM save/restore.
>>>
>>> I found a bug in the tools part of xen: The vtpm_manager fails to
>>> establish a correct connection to the tpm_emulator (activated
>>> DDUMMY_TPM flag). In xen-3.0.4-1 it works but not in the release
>>> candidates of xen-3.0.5
>>>
>>> See bug ID 966:
>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=966
>>>
>>> Jan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|