WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] 32bit HVM on 64 bit hypervisor

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] 32bit HVM on 64 bit hypervisor
From: "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:51:24 -0600
Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:50:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am looking at some PV driver issues we are seeing with 32 bit HVM guests 
hosted on 64 bit hypervisor. It looks like the problem can be traced to the 
fact that the hypervisor's view of the shared info structure is different from 
the PV drivers view - The PV driver is built for a 32 bit environment while the 
hypervisor is built for a 64 bit environment. Specifically, the offset for the 
field evtchn_mask is different as seen by the PV drivers compared to what the 
hypervisor thinks it is. How is this issue supposed to be dealt with.

Regards,

K. Y



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>