|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823.
On 17/4/07 17:22, "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> So just to confirm, you think that this should be fixed (i.e. the
> null-access should not be possible), but I should test the latest to see
> if save/restore works better there, as there is no need to search
> further for the actual cause of the "write to zero is possible" problem?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure this behaviour is intentional. Slot 0 of the
monitor_table top-level table points at a shadow linear map. So feel free to
upgrade your tree now -- no more tracking down to be done. :-)
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823.,
Keir Fraser <=
RE: [Xen-devel] A different probklem with save/restore on C/S 14823., Petersson, Mats
|
|
|
|
|