xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformanc
To: |
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance |
From: |
"Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:38:50 +0800 |
Cc: |
Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:43:58 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<C2255DB8.BD88%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<B30DA1341B0CFA4893EF8A36B40B5C5DE9DD8A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C2255DB8.BD88%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 09:45:28AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 20/3/07 09:36, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The major problem this patch is trying to fix is the performance drop
> > when multiple HVM guests are running, and I think we need a better
> > solution for this.
>
> >From my own reading of the code I would have thought that by removing that
> SSE memcmp we'd be replacing periodic SSE block memcmp with periodic
> pixel-by-pixel comparison (which is what I think we end up doing if we get
> past the SSE memcmp?). I'm thinking particularly of the VNC side of things
> rather than SDL here, by the way: you guys use SDL most of the time, right?
our developer prefer SDL, but our performance data shows that VNS also has such
issue, although is a little better than SDL.
>
> -- Keir
>
--
best rgds,
edwin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for performance, Zhai, Edwin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for performance, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for performance, Zhai, Edwin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance, Li, Xin B
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance, Li, Xin B
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance, Li, Xin B
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance,
Zhai, Edwin <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patchforperformance, Dong, Eddie
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch forperformance, Christian Limpach
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patchforperformance, Dong, Eddie
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for performance, Anthony Liguori
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][HVM] remove qemu shadow_vram patch for performance, Anthony Liguori
|
|
|