xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93
To: |
"PUCCETTI Armand" <armand.puccetti@xxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93 |
From: |
"Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 17:19:08 +0100 |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:18:28 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<45F57B85.30800@xxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcdkwQgTMoNF2D7XSwCSADsblWep1wAAECQw |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> PUCCETTI Armand
> Sent: 12 March 2007 16:11
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93
>
>
> >> When the system boots, the processor is normally in
> "real-mode", and
> >> it's definitely not got paging enabled. So we have to "make
> >> the guest OS
> >> believe this is the case". But at the same time, the guest
> OS is most
> >> likely not loaded at address zero in memory, so we need
> paging enabled
> >> to remap the GUEST PHYSICAL address to match the machine physical
> >> address. So we have a "linear map" to translate the
> "address zero" to
> >> the "start of guest memory", and so on for every page of
> memory in the
> >> guest.
> >>
> >> This is not hard to do, since the AMD-V/VT feature of the processor
> >> expects the paging-bit to be different between what the
> guest "thinks"
> >> and the actual case. In the AMD-V, there's even support to
> >> run real-mode
> >> with paging enabled, so all the BIOS-code and such will be
> running in
> >> this mode. VT has to do a bunch of tricky stuff to work around that
> >> problem.
> >>
> >> Ok fine, does this argument holds true for even non-VT and
> >> non-Pacifica enabled processors?
> >> I doubt it.
> >>
> >
> > Not precisely. I'm talking only about HVM mode, which is "full
> > virtualization". PV-mode uses a different paging interface, which at
> > least for most parts, comprise of changing the whole area
> of code in the
> > kernel that updates the page-tables, by adding code that is
> aware of the
> > THREE types of address (guest-virtual, guest-physical and
> > machine-physical). This means that there's no real need for the
> > "read-only page-tables" and "shadow-mode" - the page-table
> just contains
> > the right value for the machine-physical address. [That's not to say
> > that read-only page-tables can't be used in a PV system too
> - I'm not
> > 100% sure how the page-table management works in the PV mode].
> >
> That is very interesting info on the paging system. Mats,
> could you please
> explain a bit the working of the PV paging? How do the the guest+host
> page tables work
> together? What does the guest page table point to, i.e.
> how+when is it
> mapped onto the host page table?
>
> I have seen in the code that there are different cases of guest+host
> paging table heights. Why?
I'm sorry, I don't quite know this. I believe that the page-table has to
be the same number of levels in both Xen and the PV guest.
There's been some recent work to implement 32-bit PV on 64-bit HV, which
I think changes this by allowing a 32-bit PAE guest to run on a 64-bit
hypervisor. Someone else who works more on PV is probably better to
answer this...
In HVM, you definitely have 32-bit both PAE and non-PAE on 64-bit HV,
which obviously means different number of page-table levels (2, 3 or 4
respectively for non-PAE, PAE and 64-bit).
--
Mats
>
> thanks. Armand
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93, PUCCETTI Armand
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93,
Petersson, Mats <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] More page-table questions., Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] More page-table questions., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] More page-table questions., Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] More page-table questions., Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Questions about device/event channels in Xen., Liang Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Questions about device/event channels in Xen., Mark Williamson
- RE: [Xen-devel] Questions about device/event channels in Xen., Liang Yang
- Re: [Xen-devel] Questions about device/event channels in Xen., Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Does Dom0 always get interrupts first before they are delivered to other guest domains?, Liang Yang
|
Previous by Date: |
[Xen-devel] Tap:aio not working in current unstable?, Petersson, Mats |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93, Keir Fraser |
Previous by Thread: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93, PUCCETTI Armand |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-devel Digest, Vol 25, Issue 93, Keir Fraser |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|