 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Why is the credit scheduler better than SEDF
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Why is the credit scheduler better than SEDF |
| From: | "Ming Chang" <mingchieh.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2007 01:15:31 +0800 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:14:48 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=kQY8Ez16DDn4Z5yDOJqS7qG86sadB923Bh1L6iyedQPzGZ+lBqi+HIIabYaiL4JrMaHgSp3CRC6gUY3BDR6QsRJ8nYAbZ7vEj8sE5JMcWskUmciIeDTEXkfpkBqpsbVQ4shNvLoiH7Ps4BXaSPcb9ZNoVYo1svwL2v+n/pm6gMA= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=APTAcz9y1oaP6sqZHYrDGn8Uc1u5sd+rbOFJypd+yUknnysPrHiWsoe/5SiovFcMmLgvolNIq9v31ih6jXiAPLHseSuGK57zDNmm7K9MPPQgXWGt4yqiTkD7Og6ylN8bSM6vQRvvzUqZdVVuCi8x8hjyPGoIHKroGeDhQpVYIlI= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Dear all, I read Xen interface manual, and see the following part in the section 2.5 "SEDF will be going away and its use should be avoided once the credit scheduler has stabilized and become the default" I think it means SEDF is a temporary scheduler and credit scheduler is better I want to understand why the credit scheduling is better? And Is there any problem with SEDF? and, so far as I know, EDF does not work well in the SMP how about SEDF and credit scheuler? Thanks for you help MingChieh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Why is the interdomain communication slow?, Ming Chang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] LTTng-Xen Buffer shared between the hypervisor and a dom0 process, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Why is the interdomain communication slow?, Ming Chang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Why is the credit scheduler better than SEDF, Mark Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
