|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: fix condition for entering tickless state
I noticed that timer interrupts were running at full rate regardless
of whether the system was idle.
softlockup_get_next_event() must return the maximum of zero and the
delta to the next event, not the minimum (which is always zero or
negative, yielding zero or a very large positive number as return
value).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Index: ./patches/linux-2.6.18/softlockup-no-idle-hz.patch
===================================================================
--- ./patches/linux-2.6.18/softlockup-no-idle-hz.patch
+++ ./patches/linux-2.6.18/softlockup-no-idle-hz.patch
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ unsigned long softlockup_get_next_event(
+ !per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu))
+ return MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET;
+
-+ return min_t(long, 0, touch_timestamp + HZ - jiffies);
++ return max_t(long, 0, touch_timestamp + HZ - jiffies);
+}
+
/*
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: fix condition for entering tickless state,
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|