This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn section in

To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn section in pfn ascending order.
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:35:54 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, anderson@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 03:35:13 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070309113129.GK999%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcdiPxiwVyH50s4yEduPNwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn section in pfn ascending order.
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 9/3/07 11:31, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> But shouldn't it be
>> easy to generate the memory-area list in order in the first place?
> Dave, do you have any opinion?

I'm just thinking, it looks like a static list to me. Maybe you don't want
to make assumptions based on the #define'd constants though? Either way, I
think requiring xc_core_arch_memory_map_get() to return the required
ordering makes sense.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list