 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] wait_on_xen_event_channel
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] wait_on_xen_event_channel |
| From: | "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:34:36 -0700 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:33:53 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Why does this macro take port as an argument? It does not look like the port argument is used in the macro. I want to implement a blocking synchronization primitive in the hypervisor where the invoking vcpu will relinquish the CPU; and the execution would resume out of the blocking primitive when the vcpu is "woken up". The _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] arp during live migration, Graham, Simon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] wait_on_xen_event_channel, Ky Srinivasan |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] linux: Fix xenbus device write function., John Levon |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] wait_on_xen_event_channel, Ky Srinivasan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
