Re: [Xen-devel] Some xen questions

To:	Sébastien RICCIO <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Some xen questions
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:34:58 +0000
Delivery-date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:33:48 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<45E7BADA.9020005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acdcpakd53xOPsiYEduMdgAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Some xen questions
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214

On 2/3/07 05:49, "Sébastien RICCIO" <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> - Preemptive kernel (deskop or server) ?
> - 100, 250, 1000 Hz ?

If you get any choice on these (I thought we hardcoded them) then voluntary
preemption and 100Hz should work well.

> - Is there a way to easily build 32 and 64 bits domU kernels from
>   the same xen source directory, without messing up each other settings ?

At least in xen-unstable we now build outside the Linux source tree so you
can have separate builds for different architectures co-existing happily. I
think this may have been added after 3.0.4 however.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Some xen questions