|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: allow NMI injection
On 28/2/07 12:21, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Notably this patch changes the way that a NMI handler is registered to use
>> the native-like vector 2. This changes the guest interface though. Do you
>
> But only in a benign fashion - registering the old way is still possible,
> registering through set_trap_table now works where it previously didn't.
>
>> really need to be able to specify a custom CS? Can you not vector to the
>> flat CS and then far jump?
>
> I probably could, but I'm generally opposed to making assumptions about
> the guest where this is unnecessary (i.e. I dislike all callback pointers
> registered without selectors).
Oh I see. That sounds reasonable.
vcpu_op() isn't perhaps a great match but then neither is physdev_op()
really. I'll have a think about which is better.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|