Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Enable domain checkpointing via x

On Tuesday, 27 February 2007 at 16:10, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Basically okay, but please create a new elfnote rather than adding a
> feature. The feature stuff has kind of got a bit confused, but is meant to
> indicate features provided by Xen to a particular guest. The feature maps in
> the guest header indicate which Xen features it requires and/or supports.
> This new flag has nothing to do with the hypervisor itself so I think it
> belongs in its own elfnote (XEN_ELFNOTE_SUSPEND_CANCEL?). This can either be
> a boolean (so no elfnote description bytes) or perhaps we should map it to a
> long with value 1 for now (so we can add further save/restore revisions
> later if we like).

Ok, I've resubmitted with this approach, making the note a long.

> Oh, also remember to add the elfnote to the x86/64 head-xen.S.

Done, thanks for the heads up.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 4] Let xend choose to do hard or soft domain resumption depending on, Brendan Cully

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Error in XendCheckpoint: failed to flush file, Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Enable domain checkpointing via xm save --checkpoint, Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14118 - no new issue, 6 old issues, Zhao, Yunfeng

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]