|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH]mini-os: big-endian mini-os on ia64
On 21/2/07 13:04, "Dietmar Hahn" <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think the SWAP()'s are not that much. Maybe I can reduce this by moving some
> into the ia64-hypercall interface. What remain are the accesses to the ring
> buffers (not that simple in netfront because of the xen-macros).
> Perhaps some other guys contribute their opinion.
I would actually argue that they're scattered all over the place and it will
be hard to be sure that we have all the SWAPs we need and only the SWAPs we
need. Particularly to continue ensuring that given that most development
will be with minios having same endianness as Xen.
In short: it's ugly and unless someone really cares it will rot.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|