|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] DomU crash during migration when suspendingsource domain
> In this particular case it is quite arguable that
> cache_remove_shared_cpu_map() should check cpuid4_info[i]!=NULL, just
> as
> done in cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(). I can make this fix in our tree
> but
> something similar ought to be submitted upstream too. I'm pretty
> certain
> that this will fix your crash.
>
Let me try that out here and get back to you -- I can submit a patch
with this specific fix in if it solves the problem.
Since, as you say, this is just one aspect of dealing with hot plugging
completely different processors, I somehow feel that a point fix like
this wouldn't be accepted upstream and instead we'd need to think about
a more complete solution (If, indeed, this is feasible).
>
> Upgrading upwards actually tends to be okay. I can't think of any
> practical
> examples of how that might fail. After all, worst case we can hide the
> extra
> features from the guest since we have some control over CPUID.
> *Downgrading*
> is the problem!
Understood... I can conceive of cases where this would not be true, but
I agree that Intel/AMD usually do a good job of ensuring backward
compatibility so we could hide the newer features until all systems have
the newer processors in place and you reboot the domains.
Simon
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|