 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] new -xen.c files in sparse tree
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] new -xen.c files in sparse tree |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:22:00 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:18:51 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
What is the purpose of adding arch/i386/kernel/alternative-xen.c, when the delta to native is a single line? Even more funny - arch/i386/kernel/intel_cacheinfo-xen.c doesn't show any difference to native... Shouldn't we try to reduce the number of such files, to ease maintaining them? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] test mail, Zheng, Shaohui |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: move back skb_pull_rcsum, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] test mail, Zheng, Shaohui |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] new -xen.c files in sparse tree, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
