WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Credit Scheduler not working correct (3.0.4-0)

To: Daniele Palumbo <daniele.palumbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Credit Scheduler not working correct (3.0.4-0)
From: Emmanuel Ackaouy <ackaouy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:17:58 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:19:49 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=VgkQZea2eIhGed8Set8ohb173lk5Oij1OEjfN56T12ImySjb2xecBy/C4kwe8LLxHxImxnzn62zdy1d4lHmc17BmN94h9seYxScPzs55g/r8YxJk3vYv7EnRoOZaJFZTBZV3qQ88L0nDx4RNX8lcUKY8b15AUch5me6q9AfSnns=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200702011158.35235.daniele.palumbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <45C1B735.3020904@xxxxxx> <6621e55b1d132c29e9a45bc307f9a127@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200702011158.35235.daniele.palumbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:58, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
On Thursday 01 February 2007 11:30, Emmanuel Ackaouy wrote:
Also, setting cap=100 on a UP guest is pointless. Just leave it
as zero. A VCPU isn't going to get more than 100% of a physical
CPU anyway.

is pointless if you have only 1 vcpu, right?

Yes, because 100 means 1 physical CPU.
100 * number of VCPUs is the upper bound anyway.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel