WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Use string bounded functions

To: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Use string bounded functions
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:49:13 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:50:10 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A39F71D3-F989-4A46-A1CE-0055B4D1BA8B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcdDrEJagM3XtK+fEduROAAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Use string bounded functions
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
That's overkill really. Once the uses are all gone from the repository we
can just kill them off. Any out-of-tree patches can easily be fixed up.

 -- Keir

On 29/1/07 13:41, "Jimi Xenidis" <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm all for this.
> Are we going to mark all the "bad" ones as deprecated for some time?
> -JX
> 
> On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:10 AM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> 
>> On Monday 29 January 2007 11:52, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> On 29/1/07 10:10, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> The attached patch replaces sprintf with snprintf and strncpy with
>>>> strlcpy.
>>>> 
>>>> There are various cases where no NULL-terminated strings are
>>>> guaranteed
>>>> and eventual possible overflows. This patch fixes them.
>>>> 
>>>> BTW: Since Xen kernel has its own string functions, can't we just
>>>> remove
>>>> sprintf() and strncpy()? IMO, Xen should not inherit the
>>>> historical C
>>>> relicts.
>>> 
>>> This makes plenty of sense. Strncpy() in particular is dangerous and
>>> strlcpy() is always preferable. So I'd be happy to see strncat/
>>> strncpy die.
>> 
>> sprintf() is also dangerous. snprintf() is better. sprintf() should
>> also die.
>> 
>>> There are a few uses remaining (particularly in arch/ia64) that
>>> you'll have
>>> to fix first.
>> 
>> Yeah. But due to lack of hw, I can't even build test for ia64 and ppc.
>> So when I send the patches, intel and ibm have to verify first that
>> they don't
>> break anything.
>> 
>>> And please add 'signed-off-by' attribution when you post patches!
>> 
>> Will do.
>> 
>> Christoph
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>