WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xend loads slowly

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xend loads slowly
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:48:15 +0000
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Pilger <pilger.david@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:49:04 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C1DE7F71.8374%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070125141315.GB29493@xxxxxxxxxx> <C1DE7F71.8374%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:38:25PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 25/1/07 14:13, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Is there any work scheduled on the Xen roadmap yet to remove the need to
> > use netloop driver in Dom0 ? It would be very desirable to eliminate the
> > complicated peth0/eth0/vif0 interface renaming/duplication for Dom0 so that
> > the regular OS distro provided networking scripts 'just work' with Xen. So
> > if people wanted a bridged setup they can simply create their regular
> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0 (or equivalant) - so XenD would
> > only need to worry about the vif-* scripts, and we can kill off network-*
> > scripts.
> 
> You can set things up today without the loopback. But if domU<->dom0 traffic
> is allowed then you can end up with all domU tx slots tied up in dom0 socket
> buffers for unbounded time. If domU<->dom0 traffic is disallowed, or just
> not done, then the loopback serves no other purpose.

Yes, I was specifically thinking about the ideas that have been brought
up every now & then about fixing the netback side of things to avoid the 
dom0 socket buffers being pinned indefinitely. So we can safely have the
DomU <-> Dom0 traffic without needing netloop.

Regar,ds
Dan.
-- 
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
|=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
|=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>