|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Xen v.s Stable Kernel
Hi All;
I can't find any related discussion on list archives so i just want to learn
could anybody tell me is there any specific reason not to upgrade
xen-3.0.4-testing tree to for example 2.6.16.38 which fixes dozens of
security related problems after .33, i know as a distro packager its my
responsibility to sync/modify whatever is needed but as an end-user
perspective i just want to download the newly released stable tarball and use
my xen powered kernel. And i realize mainline inclusion solves all that
issues but is it possible to maintain testing trees against its most recent
stable version to solve these problems until xen merged into mainline and
releasing minor version against them or am i have to learn live with that :)?
Cheers
--
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
pgpKfg33ac0dM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Xen v.s Stable Kernel,
S.Çağlar Onur <=
|
|
|
|
|