Re: [Xen-devel] hvm_op.h misses explicit license

To:	John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] hvm_op.h misses explicit license
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:14:34 +0000
Delivery-date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:15:39 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20070123204922.GA20555@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acc/oHHOsGyr8quTEduptAAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] hvm_op.h misses explicit license
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620



On 23/1/07 20:49, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> hvm_op.h doesn't have the license block like other public header files.
> I didn't check for other cases, but could this inconsistency be fixed?

That's the only one, will fix.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] hvm_op.h misses explicit license