| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5][IA64][HVM] Windowscrash
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:19:37AM +0900, Masaki Kanno wrote:
[...]
> Hi Tristan,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> >Maybe os-init is not the best name.
>
> Maybe os-init is not the best command name as you say. If you have idea
> of command name, could you send it?
something like
xm trigger init|reset|nmi
> >Maybe the balance between code in hypervisor (very small) and code in xm
> >(larger) is not very good, but difficule to improve !
>
> I examined oneself. I should have checked a target domain (HVM domain or
> PV domain) in hypervisor. I will send the patch which moved the check of
> target domain into hypervisor. Maybe not difficult to improve.
I think it is normal xm code is bigger than hypervisor. But this makes x86
people not very happy!
BTW, it would be nice if the vcpu number could be specified!
Tristan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home