WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Modular Xen

To: "Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Modular Xen
From: "Guy Zana" <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:41:15 -0500
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Pilger <pilger.david@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:39:20 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200701161656.19913.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acc5j0j4ldaswiopTFuIJTV/QVnJ+wAA+6IA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Modular Xen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Mark Williamson
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 6:56 PM
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Keir Fraser; David Pilger
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Modular Xen
> 
> > Hi Keir, I look at it from the perspective of extending instead of 
> > embeding... This way, Xen will be easily ported to any 
> environment, it 
> > will be much more easier to program extensions, etc...
> 
> Is this really the case, though?
> 
> Assuming we're not talking about dynamically loadable modules 
> here, there would seem to be a fairly limited gain in ease of 
> extension: Xen compiles
> *very* quickly already, sufficiently so that it's not 
> particularly significant compared to the time taken to reboot 
> your machine to test your changes.
>
> I wouldn't expect the ability to recompile a module 
> separately to make much difference to this...
> 

I don't think that compilation is the main issue discussed. Porting is a
good example where loadables modules are useful... assuming that not all
platforms support all of Xen features.
Keeping track of what happen in this list for a while and I can
definitely say that there is a "feature contention" around :)
A modular approach can be a great improvement IMHO.

-- Guy.

> There are circumstances where it might be nice to load 
> *something* into Xen at boot time though...  I think the ACM 
> / sHype work supports (or at least, supported at some stage) 
> loading policy data as a multiboot module.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> 
> --
> Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  
> And no pedals!
> Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
> Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
> Mark: My wheel has a wheel!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>