|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282
>If there are dependencies among the auto-generated headers then they need to
>be listed explicitly. Multiple dependencies listed in a single rule can be
>made in parallel.
No, that's not the case - each header can be built independently, since the
#include-s are being substituted before handing to the preprocessor (not the
compiler, hence incomplete definitions don't matter), and substituted back
afterwards.
John, in order to understand what's wrong on your end I'll need more than just
the failing compiler invocation, specifically all the commands run while
building in
xen/include (invoked from xen/Makefile:73). Since that's a series of $(MAKE)
invocations there, failure here should prevent making $(TARGET). Hence I
have to assume that something fails in the process of handling xen/include, but
doesn't indicate so through the process exit status (for that knowing what
actually got generated in xen/include/compat/ might also provide a clue).
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282,
Jan Beulich <=
RE: [Xen-devel] Building broken with CS 13282, Yu, Ping Y
|
|
|
|
|