Re: [Xen-devel] confusion over vcpumask in mmuext_op

To:	John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] confusion over vcpumask in mmuext_op
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:53:52 +0000
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:53:38 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20070104143200.GA28639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AccwECYXZMlT6JwDEduNhgAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] confusion over vcpumask in mmuext_op
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620

On 4/1/07 14:32, "John Levon" <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:41:47AM +0000, Mark Williamson wrote:
> 
>> Linux's drivers/xen/Kconfig defines:
>> if XEN
>> config XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION
>> hex
>> default 0x00030203
> 
> Ah thanks. I must admit to being a bit confused though. If
> xen-unstable's sparse tree isn't using the latest interface, what is?
> Just us ? :)

The tools and Xen itself use the latest version, and minios too I think. We
haven't got round to moving Linux off of dom0_ops, hence the interface
version hasn't yet been bumped there.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] confusion over vcpumask in mmuext_op