WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161

To: "Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:08:09 +0000
Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:07:56 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <683860AD674C7348A0BF0DE3918482F603FB02A7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Accq0SL2Dj7aZnwpTKGdoklUY7dbnAAYBqi3
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.2.061213
On 28/12/06 10:40 pm, "Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am seeing a domain_crash in the HVM HPET code when booting a SLES10
> Big SMP kernel on a 64bit hypervisor.
> pae=1, apic=1, acpi=1, memory=512, vcpus=1, cpus="0"
> There are 4 cores in the system, and Dom0 is SMP with vcpus on all cores
> (any core, not pinned).
> 
> This same SLES10 Big SMP kernel boots fine on a 64bit hv with a 3.0.3
> base of code, i.e. prior to hvm hpet additions.  I tried booting this
> guest kernel with hpet=disable but did not make a difference, and still
> crashed at hpet.c:374. Testing is on 13161 changeset from xen-unstable.

This should be easily reproducible. I'll take a look -- I expect the hpet
code just needs some 'loosening' in what it accepts.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel