WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] VCPU affinity

I am chasing a bug we seem to be hitting where we are not able to specify the 
binding; will let you know once I know more.

Regards,

K. Y

>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:01 AM, in message
<0951ba397e5752bf7a54f5ecaf67ad4e@xxxxxxxxx>, Emmanuel Ackaouy
<ackaouy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> On Dec 18, 2006, at 16:56, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>> What is the best way to pin VCPUs. It looks like the implementation of 
>> affinity currently  is at best  only "soft".
>>
>> Regards,
> 
> VCPU affinity should not be soft. By the time the set affinity hypercall
> returns, the VCPU in question should be running on a physical CPU
> set in its affinity mask.
> 
> If it's not behaving this way then something is broken. Can you send
> more details?


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>