| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] kexec trouble
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:23:36PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> We *must* find a more sane way to maintain the linux kernel sources,
> this is one more reason why mixing sparse tree and patches isn't going
> to fly. As far I know at least the sparse tree is planned to be
> dropped, now with dom0 and xen being decoupled (3.0.3+) it should be
> possible without too much hassle. Any plans what to use instead? quilt
> patch queue?
A full hg or git tree would be nicer... the way things are going,
patches applied to such a tree wouldn't be appropriate for upstream
inclusion without cleaning up anyway, so I don't see what the patch
queue method will buy us as opposed to a full tree. Of course nearly
anything would be better than the sparse + patches method.
Cheers,
Muli
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home