|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add canonical address checks to HVM
On 29/11/06 15:05, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +#define IS_CANO_ADDRESS(add) (((long)(add) >> 47) == ((long)(add) >> 63))
> +#else
> +#define IS_CANO_ADDRESS(add) 1
> +#endif
> +
Is there any guarantee that right-shift is signed when using gcc?
How about (int16_t)((add) >> 48) == -(int)(((add) >> 47) & 1) ??
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|