|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add canonical address checks to HVM
 
On 29/11/06 15:05, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add proper long mode canonical address checks to PIO emulation and MSR
> writes, the former paralleling the limit checks added for 32-bit guests.
> Also catches two more cases in the MSR handling code where only ECX
> (rather than RCX) should be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
I wonder if we would be better consistently *removing* the canonical-address
checks? It's not a security issue after all -- the check is done in hardware
only to prevent code from ever depending on being able to use the high
address bits for software flags. I think it is harmless to deviate from
native behaviour on this issue and makes our emulation code smaller and
simpler.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |