WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Schedule for Xen 3.0.4

To: "Sean Dague" <japh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Schedule for Xen 3.0.4
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:36:21 -0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:37:02 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C18C79DB.4F96%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061129153114.GD13678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccTy5wEujcJKyAHRRWTkdmw115fHwAI5Tsg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Schedule for Xen 3.0.4
> > The xen-unstable tree has seen significant progress since 3.0.3 was
> forked,
> > particularly in HVM cleanup and bug fixing. SMP and ACPI HVM guests
now
> work
> > reliably, as does the Windows Vista installer. Many of these
improvements
> > are the result of large patches and interface cleanups that are
> unsuitable
> > for backporting to 3.0.3. Since we'd like to make these improvements
> > available to Xen users as soon as possible, now seems a good time to
call
> > feature freeze in preparation for 3.0.4.
> 
> What about the possibility of reving the kernel to something more
modern?
> For instance, the nforce5 drivers for Linux didn't make it until
2.6.17,
> and didn't get truly stable until 2.6.18.
> 
> I think it would be advantageous if xen-unstable was using a kernel
closer
> to those being shipped in modern distros, so that xen-unstable testing
was
> more applicable to current distros, and visa versa.

We really need to get away from having a linux tree in xen-unstable
anyhow. It would be cool if by the time that 3.0.4 goes out we have the
out-of-tree linux 2.6.18/19 level up to the same spec as our 2.6.16. We
can update the top-level Makefiles to make it very easy to build
out-of-tree kernels. We can also make 2.6.18 RPMs and tar balls
available for download. None of this actually has to be directly coupled
to the 3.0.4 release.  

Ian



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel